Slumdog Millionaire: Must see movie of the year. Danny Boyle is pure genius.

Just saw this at Embarcadero Theater in SF tonight. It was a packed crowd even weeks after the opening weekend, and at the 10:05pm showing.

 City of God meets the slums of India. It will probably be the best film I see all year. It's an eye-opener -- one that transports you to another place and puts the petty problems of one's own everyday life in a radically new perspective.

             
Click here to download:
Slumdog_Millionaire_Must_see_m.zip (679 KB)

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted 10 months ago

13 comments

Jan 25, 2009
Sachin Agarwal said...
saw slumdog a couple months ago. Absolutely loved it. I've seen many movies that take place in India (obviously i'm drawn to them) but none have been as raw or as real as this one.

Throughout the movie i was noticing how this portrayal of India truly is how I know it. But don't take that in a bad way. All the beauty that you see, all the language, the slums, the people...totally true.

But the corruption, violence, and problems in the country... while they are true and really there, are not something a tourist would ever see. I say that because I encourage everyone to visit India in their lifetime. The Mumbai attacks last month were sad and unfortunately, but i hope it doesn't deter anything from seeing this great country.

I am amazed that Danny Boyle, and UK citizen, was able to produce the most true to life movie about India I have ever seen.

See the high res trailer for Slumdog here:

http://sachin.posterous.com/danny-boyle-is-the-man-slugdog

Jan 25, 2009
Arthur Alston said...
Loved the movie too. I couldn't agree more with you. My vote for Oscar movie of the year.
Jan 25, 2009
With you on this Sachin, (and I haven't seen the film yet..) however, when i hear my friends describe it - the rawness, the contrast of life, rich and poor - all true. That's the beauty of life in India... no where in the world can you see it or experience it.
Jan 25, 2009
David Mann said...
We saw it just before it exploded, without knowing anything about it (I thought it was a comedy about kids in India...!). It's an amazing movie, made all the more stunning in that we didn't know what was coming.
Jan 25, 2009
thepete said...
I'll be the fly in the ointment here and say I enjoyed the film but don't think it was that amazing. In fact, I found it to be unamazing. It's very much a textbook, underdog-gets-the-girl story. I'm not sure why everyone is saying this movie is so great. It's fine. Maybe it's the uniqueness of the accurate portrayal of India? Has anyone seen "Water"? I'm curious how accurate it is... ah well... can't please everyone.
Jan 25, 2009
Awesome film. Many memorable images from the film but one of my favorites is of young Jamal's decision to jump in the cesspit to see his favorite actor and obtain his autograph. Everyone in the theatre gasped in unison. Great stuff.
Jan 25, 2009
Tom Davis said...
Good flick. The way it jumped around helped with the cookie-cutter nature, but in the end I'm leaning towards "thepete"'s opinion. If it's so good because of its depiction of India, well, I guess it's good that more people may watch it and realize how much of the world functions.
Jan 25, 2009
Garry Tan said...
I think it's easy to forget how good the developed world has it. I think there are very few avenues other than film that most everyday people in 1st world nations will see what it really is like elsewhere.

Also, this is interesting: Mercedes-Benz asked that its logos be removed in scenes taking place in the slums. The company, according to Danny Boyle, did not want to be associated with the poverty-stricken area, fearing that that might taint its image.

Jan 26, 2009
thepete said...
I definitely agree that the locale of this movie is important--however, there is plenty of corruption in the first world, too. Aside from that however is something else that's important--in western cinema we very rarely see images of anything but our own familiar worlds because most distributors only want to give us what they know we want. This is the real strength of Danny Boyle as a filmmaker, in my opinion. Regardless of what his films are about, they do alright in the box office. They're not blockbusters, but they make money. He's in this middle-ground where he can modestly make the movies he wants to make and doesn't have to follow the orders of some brain-dead studio exec. When he does do that, we get a movie like "The Beach." I just hope all of this success "Slumdog" is seeing doesn't shove him into a new world of expectations where if his next film fails to get nominated for Oscars his career will be over.

MB wanted their logos removed from the poverty-stricken scenes? Sheesh. With the economy as bad as it is, I'm thinking they'd welcome the association with poor people since there are so many of us out here now. ;)

"Mercedes-Benz: Our cars are driven through poor neighborhoods all the time."

Jan 26, 2009
Chaim Dauermann said...
I am afraid I have to go against the grain here and join thepete in voicing my dissent. I thought it was a good movie, but unremarkable apart from the vivid and visually arresting portrayal of its setting. Frankly, I am astonished at the level of acclaim the film has received. My objection to the film can be summed up thusly: Set Slumdog Millionaire in any American slum, and no one would have paid the movie very much mind. The setting serves the film very well, and it's riveting because it renders the film as something unique in the current American film landscape. But I have to maintain that it doesn't make it a good movie.

I thought the story-telling style was rather slapdash -- I felt like I was watching 3 different scripts put together. Stylistically, I found echoes of both City of God (one of the best films of the past 10 years) and (oddly) The Usual Suspects, but found myself forced to compare it unfavorably to these two movies. Though Slumdog began as a sharp and compelling portrayal of life in poverty, by the end it ended up as some cheap, hokey and predictable tale of star-crossed lovers and a half-hearted notion of "destiny" which left me feeling empty, and perhaps a bit cheated.

Don't get me wrong, this is a good movie. But I expect far more than this from a Best Picture winner, and even a nominee. Having seen all 5 of the Best Picture nominees, I can honestly say that Slumdog Millionaire rests comfortable at the bottom of the heap in my opinion. Should it win (and this looks to be certain) I'll find it to be the weakest Best Picture since A Beautiful Mind.

Jan 26, 2009
thepete said...
Yeah, well-said, Chaim. And remember, Oscar nominations don't mean quality--nor do Oscar wins. If memory serves, "Good Will Hunting" got an Oscar for best screenplay. I sussed the premise of the film from the *music* in the *opening titles*. It doesn't get much more predictable than that and yet, it won an Oscar.

This is one of the reasons I moved away from Hollywood. I don't expect much from Oscar nominations or wins. I'm just satisfied when the Academy's opinions match up with mine.

Jan 26, 2009
Chaim Dauermann said...
Thepete - Thanks for the reply. Yes, I am well aware that Oscar nominations do not mean quality. Yet at the same time, they are the closest thing to a "seal of approval" that American show-business betowed upon films aside from box office returns. Frankly, the whole ritual of the Oscar has always fascinated me, almost for as long as films have themselves.  And, although I know that a nomination or win does not equal quality, there are plenty of people out there who think that they do, which is perhaps what aggravates me so much.

And, yeah, when the Academy's opinion matches up with mine, I am usually surprised and delighted. I am often far from mainstream, and once in a while the Academy, too, ventures off of the beaten path and does something unexpected.
Jan 26, 2009
thepete said...
Agreed--it is what it is, right? :)

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter